An Investigation of the Digital Literacy Skill Levels of Ceit Teacher Candidates


Özet Görüntüleme: 141 / PDF İndirme: 68

Yazarlar

  • Çisem Yaşar İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi
  • Mustafa Tuncay Sarıtaş Balıkesir Üniversitesi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11316718

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Avrupa dijital yeterlilik çerçevesi, dijital okuryazarlık, kariyer, böte, öğretmen adayları

Özet

The aim of this study is to evaluate the proficiency levels of pre-service teachers in the Department of Computer Education and Instructional Technology in the European Digital Competence Framework for digital literacy. Data were collected using a semi-structured interview form and descriptive analytic methodology, one of the qualitative research techniques. Expert advice was used to finalize the data collection tool. The participants consisted of 16 pre-service teachers studying at the faculty of education of a university in Western Anatolia in the spring semester of the 2018-2019 academic year. Five main themes and sub-themes were formed from the information obtained from the interview form. The main themes are information processing, communication, content creation, security and problem solving.  After analyzing the data collected using the form developed in accordance with the European Digital Competence Framework, it was determined that nine pre-service teachers were at the expert level, five pre-service teachers were at the development level and two pre-service teachers were at the beginning level in terms of digital literacy skills. In addition, it is noteworthy that third and fourth grade pre-service teachers responded to the questions expressed at a user level suitable for novice level. It is recommended that educators should be aware of these problems and appropriate curricula should be developed with these problems in mind.

Referanslar

Arkonaç, S. A. (2017). Psikolojide söz ve anlam analizi: niteliksel duruş [Analyzing words and meaning in psychology: a qualitative stance]. Hiperlink Yayınları.

Arslan, A. (2023). Determining the Effect of University Students' Technology Usage Levels on Digital Reading Self-Efficacy. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 12(1), 73-84. doi.org/10.14686/buefad.993603

Bal, H. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntem ve teknikleri (uygulamalı-örnekli)[Qualitative research methods and techniques (applied-examples)]. Bursa: Sentez Yayıncılık.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Çepni, S. (2007). Araştırma ve proje çalışmalarına giriş [Introduction to research and project work]. Trabzon: Celepler Matbaacılık.

Çetin, O. (2016). Pedagojik Formasyon Programı ile Lisans Eğitimi Fen Bilimleri Öğretmen Adaylarının Dijital Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi [Investigation of Digital Literacy Levels of Pedagogical Formation Program and Undergraduate Science Teacher Candidates]. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18(2). doi.org /10.17556/jef.01175.

Dijilopedi, 2023. https://dijilopedi.com/2019-turkiye-internet-kullanim-ve-sosyal-medya-istatistikleri/ (Erişim Tarihi: 28 Ekim 2023.)

Flinders, D. J. (1997). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing: Steinar kvale. thousand oaks, ca: Sage publications, 1996.

Karabacak, Z. İ., & Sezgin, A. A. (2019). Türkiye’de dijital dönüşüm ve dijital okuryazarlık [Digital transformation and digital literacy in Turkey]. Türk İdare Dergisi, 1(488), 319-343.

Kozan, M., & Özek, M. B. (2019). Böte bölümü öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri ve siber zorbalığa ilişkin duyarlılıklarının incelenmesi [Investigation of pre-service teachers' digital literacy levels and their sensitivity to cyberbullying]. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 29(1), 107-120. doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.538657.

Hammersley, M. (1998). Partisanship and credibility: the case of antiracist educational research.

Maxwell, J. (1992). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 62(3), 279-301.

Neuman, W. L. (2016). Toplumsal araştırma yöntemleri: nitel ve nicel araştırmalar [Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative research]. Ankara:Yayın Odası.

Ogelman, H. G., Demirci, F., & Güngör, H. (2022). Okul öncesi eğitimi öğretmenlerinin dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Investigation of digital literacy levels of preschool education teachers]. Trakya eğitim dergisi, 12(1), 235-247. doi.org/10.24315/tred.887072.

Özerbaş, M. A., & Kuralbayeva, A. (2018). Türkiye ve Kazakistan öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi [Assessment of digital literacy levels of pre-service teachers in Turkey and Kazakhstan]. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(1), 16-25. doi.org/10.21666/muefd.314761.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri [Qualitative research and evaluation methods]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Richardson, J. W., Clemons, J., & Sterrett, W. (2020). How Superintendents Use Technology to Engage Stakeholders. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 5(4), 954-988.

Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(3), doi.org/10.17169/fqs-2.3.923.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

Terzi, O. & İşli, A. G. (2020). Dijitalleşen dünyada dijital okuryazarlık: banka müşterileri üzerine bir araştırma [Digital literacy in a digitalizing world: a study on bank customers]. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi (AKSOS), 7, 50-67.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2003). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (5. Baskı) [Qualitative research methods in social sciences. (5th ed.)]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (9. Baskı)[ Qualitative research methods in social sciences. (9th Edition)]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Yontar, A. (2019). Öğretmen adaylarının dijital okuryazarlık düzeyleri [Digital literacy levels of pre-service teachers]. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(4), 815-824, doi.org/10.16916/aded.593579.

İndir

Yayınlanmış

2024-05-26

Nasıl Atıf Yapılır

Yaşar, Çisem, & Sarıtaş, M. T. (2024). An Investigation of the Digital Literacy Skill Levels of Ceit Teacher Candidates. International Journal of Educational and Social Sciences, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11316718